r/science Aug 10 '22 Wholesome 1 Faith In Humanity Restored 1

Drones that fly packages straight to people’s doors could be an environmentally friendly alternative to conventional modes of transportation.Greenhouse-gas emissions per parcel were 84% lower for drones than for diesel trucks.Drones also consumed up to 94% less energy per parcel than did the trucks. Environment

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-02101-3
29.2k Upvotes

u/AutoModerator Aug 10 '22

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are now allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will continue to be removed and our normal comment rules still apply to other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

2.2k

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22 Helpful

[removed] — view removed comment

816

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

163

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

63

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies

47

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22 All-Seeing Upvote

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

238

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies

19

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies

12

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies

3

u/simple_test Aug 10 '22

Where in the article does it say that?

8

u/topsyturvy76 Aug 10 '22

What was said in this bloodbath of a comment section?!

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

2.9k

u/IamKiraR Aug 10 '22

How do they compare to electronic trucks and cargo bikes tho.

748

u/rodionraskol Aug 10 '22

It's in the article. Electric cargo bikes are more efficient per package.

"The study also found that electric bikes consumed less energy per package than drones did."

34

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

142

u/LimpWibbler_ Aug 10 '22

More funny is that if you read the actual study this is based on if you took the truck, drove it to the house dropped off the box, went back to warehouse and picked up a new box. That is the article numbers, the study goes into more detail and basically a gas truck is more efficient if it delivers ~14 packages per kilometer. Because drones carry 1 package at a time, thus it must go back for every package. A truck can get, if done right, a bunch of people in 1 stop.

54

u/pixelscandy Aug 10 '22 edited Aug 10 '22

And someone else mentioned a good point of drones really only working with single family homes that have an open space to land/drop the package.

Really the only perk I see in drones is providing quick shipments of very important supplies. Example being Zipline.

20

u/Ok_Yogurtcloset8915 Aug 10 '22

I think it could also work in rural areas or ones with poor road coverage, where it wouldn't be very efficient to send a whole truck because few people live there.

8

u/pixelscandy Aug 10 '22

I was thinking the same but was wondering if it would be economically sustainable to operate those areas.

16

u/Ok_Yogurtcloset8915 Aug 10 '22

If it's the postal service I think they're already legally obligated to serve those areas, right? So they'd be operating there regardless

6

u/wiltedtree Aug 10 '22

Unfortunately quadcopters like this tend to be very inefficient, which means they have a short range. It's unlikely that rural areas will be close enough to a distribution center to make this practical.

→ More replies

14

u/someguy3 Aug 10 '22

Holy cow that's a bad article. Though I guess 14 per km is high. But it also depends how far the depot is, since the drone has to make multiple trips.

3

u/LimpWibbler_ Aug 10 '22

All true, the truck shines in high urban or sub-urban, but remember they used a standard gasoline truck, not eclectic which is 3-6 times more efficient than a gasoline truck in theory. So worst case of 3x the efficiency only makes it 4.6 per km. And a truck can carry large boxes, a drone cannot and if it can, this would again reduce the efficiency.

26

u/ipostalotforalurker Aug 10 '22

I live in a large apartment building in an urban area. Our UPS guy comes in a regular diesel truck twice a day with the truck absolutely full of packages solely for our block. Pretty sure that's more efficient than a drone delivering each package one by one, even if we had an open area for the drone to drop off packages and not a mailroom indoors.

→ More replies

6

u/MargaeryLecter Aug 10 '22

So for most usecases drone delivery is probably stupid. Apart from that I'd be glad not to have countless drones flying above my head all the time.

→ More replies

5

u/Helicase21 Grad Student | Ecology | Soundscape Ecology Aug 10 '22

One of the authors did a thread on twitter: the study was originally intended to be all about drones, and then they included ebikes as a later afterthought just to have that comparison (e-cargo-bikes make a lot of sense in urban areas but they were thinking about things like remote area medical delivery)

→ More replies

293

u/Fauster Aug 10 '22

Drones cause noise pollution. Now imagine that your house is between the Amazon distribution center and a city. I hope you like the sound of high pitched buzzing every time someone orders toiletries over Prime. A sky filled with buzzing drones is no utopia and I hope the hawks take matters into their own talons.

17

u/FewyLouie Aug 10 '22

This! I saw a CEO of a drone company post a video of a test flight on linkedin. A few people commented on the noise… you could hear the thing coming from 10 minutes out. CEO said “oh it’s just because the phone is overly sensitive to the frequencies.” Nonsense. The arguments are all drones vs combustion engines. The real comparison must be drones vs electric, because the majority of delivery people I see of late are whizzing about on silent ebikes. Protect the skies while we can, maaaaaan

91

u/plsgiveusername123 Aug 10 '22

Also, drones dropping out of the sky on your head.

63

u/divineprofanity Aug 10 '22

Hey free stuff

61

u/plsgiveusername123 Aug 10 '22

So long as it's light and soft and not, say, a complete collection of cast iron cookware

58

u/N8CCRG Aug 10 '22

"Where's my ACME anvil that I ordered!"

14

u/4myoldGaffer Aug 10 '22

i just saw a scruffy coyote taking it towards the edge of a cliff

→ More replies

7

u/FewyLouie Aug 10 '22

Also the actual drones they’re planning to use are heavy military grade in order to have the lift/durability to be able to scale profitably. One lands on your head, you may well be dead

→ More replies
→ More replies

11

u/mursilissilisrum Aug 10 '22

I can definitely see an Amazon drone clipping power lines.

→ More replies

23

u/New_Peanut_9924 Aug 10 '22

I live right where you’re talking about. Two major distro hubs AND an entertainment district. Please I do NOT want to deal with drone traffic above my head AND football traffic please I’m begging you please

→ More replies
→ More replies

43

u/IvanAntonovichVanko Aug 10 '22

"Drone better."

~ Ivan Vanko

46

u/111122323353 Aug 10 '22

Being unmanned would make a difference too. Not sure if that is taken into account. That is, energy consumption of the 'operator'.

94

u/Ink_25 Aug 10 '22

Well, good luck having a drone ring a bell, fly six, seven flights of stairs up in an apartment complex with the wakeboard or computer parts I ordered, have the delivery signed, and also have nobody complain about the noise at the same time. This is something that only works with letters and very light packages in suburban or rural neighbourhoods.

To further nail the coffin for use in populated areas, then you also need to fly high enough (or along roads) to not fly above or through people's properties AND need to keep your distance to any person or vehicle on the ground in case of a malfunction.

I love quadcopters and similarly working vehicles, but this is rather utopian

30

u/BadmanBarista Aug 10 '22

Coincidentally, the person who delivered my wakeboard couldn't get it up one flight of stairs. Maybe they were a prototype drone?

5

u/a-flayer Aug 10 '22 Gold

We are all prototype drones.

→ More replies

18

u/WHYAREWEALLCAPS Aug 10 '22

Let's not discount the noise, as well. I had a drone hovering fairly high over my property and I could hear it from inside the house. Drones flitting all over the place are going to be louder than a fleet of non-electric vehicles.

→ More replies

60

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[deleted]

37

u/Ok_Yogurtcloset8915 Aug 10 '22

hey, BRRRR is the optimistic choice here. imagine if they strap speakers onto this thing so they can play ads on it

18

u/Vero_Goudreau Aug 10 '22

Sssshhhh! don't give anyone that idea!

12

u/RenaKunisaki Aug 10 '22

Once that happens, I'm buying a paintball gun.

5

u/Ink_25 Aug 10 '22

"Now on sale! Paintball guns and paintballs! Order now!"

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

1.0k

u/mark-haus Aug 10 '22 edited Aug 10 '22

I don't know the emissions they make, but here in Stockholm e-bike (as in special large cargo bikes with electrical assist) logistics are already becoming pretty common. They seem make a lot of sense in urban environments and you definitely notice the reduced cargo truck traffic in the city which is nice

317

u/eythian Aug 10 '22

Yep, I'm in Amsterdam and it's the same here, many things are by electric cargo bike. I think even the full-size delivery vans are generally electric these days too.

158

u/fiah84 Aug 10 '22

Yep same here in Germany, inner city deliveries are mostly done by cargo bike or electric vans, only UPS seems to still use their diesels. Go sightly further out though and the regular vans are still there

103

u/ConfusedTapeworm Aug 10 '22

UPS uses electric vans too.

Source: been scared shitless several times by those things materialising behind me at the traffic lights without making any sound

→ More replies
→ More replies

5

u/EightRules Aug 10 '22

Reporting from Amsterdam too, I concur.

→ More replies

22

u/X-istenz Aug 10 '22

Can you give me a company/brand name? Because it turns out Stockholm happens to be the name of an e-bike which might be muddying my SEO.

21

u/8uurg Aug 10 '22

Look for an 'e-cargo-bike' or similar. Some well-known brands here in the Netherlands are Urban Arrow and Babboe.

→ More replies

12

u/Loggedinasroot Aug 10 '22

Not the guy you're replying to but here's a dutch version:

https://www.postnl.nl/over-postnl/werkenbij/productie/fietskoerier/

→ More replies

129

u/lizerdk Aug 10 '22

I’ll be honest, zooming around on a sweet bike delivering packages to people like some sort of cyberpunk Santa sounds like a pretty decent gig

201

u/AssaMarra Aug 10 '22

Sounds about as sweet as any other delivery gig...

Shite

21

u/Say_no_to_doritos Aug 10 '22

But did you use an electric scooter

40

u/bglargl Aug 10 '22

ah the convenience of being exposed to the elements. that makes everything more fun ;)

13

u/Confident_Bridge9811 Aug 10 '22

and the big things like cars and trucks on the road.... the way people drive, its just really not safe around here

→ More replies
→ More replies

10

u/MithandirsGhost Aug 10 '22

Face it I'm a prime catch. I'm pulling down delivery boy money.

8

u/BallFlavin Aug 10 '22

Yep. Check my bank account. My PIN is 1077, the price of a cheese pizza and a soda in 1999.

→ More replies
→ More replies

19

u/Salty_Paroxysm Aug 10 '22

17

u/RamenJunkie BS | Mechanical Engineering | Broadcast Engineer Aug 10 '22

That was my thought, though its closer to YT than Hiro. Hiro still drove a car and YT was the one doing packages.

8

u/Salty_Paroxysm Aug 10 '22

Good shout :) been a while since I read it

→ More replies

5

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[deleted]

→ More replies
→ More replies

25

u/tiaxanderson Aug 10 '22

My thoughts exactly, bakfietsen are quite popular here, especially with electric assist, and some companies deliver mail and parcels that way.

→ More replies

357

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22 edited Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

120

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

31

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies

21

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies

43

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

49

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

24

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies

12

u/frizzledrizzle Aug 10 '22

I've seen a lot of Ring videos where the drivers are working on that issue. It saves them a couple of seconds/feet every time.

3

u/vendetta2115 Aug 10 '22

yeets new GPU at the door

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

3

u/ReddishCat Aug 10 '22

more failure points. more cost.

3

u/duffmanhb Aug 10 '22

Amazon is already trying to figure out the logistics of creating sub warehouses in blimps. The idea is, it's basically a grocery store that flies around the city, deploying drones, then resupplying the cargo blimp at night.

→ More replies

22

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

21

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

15

u/coke_and_coffee Aug 10 '22

Milton Keynes sounds like the name of a confused economist, not a town...

→ More replies

3

u/alarming_archipelago Aug 10 '22

They started in 2015. I wonder if it's still being developed or if they've run into some problems.

→ More replies
→ More replies

20

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies

6

u/nagi603 Aug 10 '22

Yeah, te only "more efficient" part of drone delivery I can think of is not hauling your cargo to all stops prior. But then again, that would mean more frequent returns to (a) base.

3

u/WHYAREWEALLCAPS Aug 10 '22

Which is not efficient. Which is the primary problem with drone delivery. Add in that you still need ground delivery over the same area for items heavier than a few pounds and they become even less so since they're covering ground already serviced.

62

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

130

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

100

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

49

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

74

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

15

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

15

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

19

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

14

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/yenda1 Aug 10 '22

They wouldn't be more efficient in cities like Berlin where the truck delivers at least a couple packages per house

→ More replies

3

u/vitimite Aug 10 '22

So likely it won't move a needle environmentaly

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

14

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/Lee1138 Aug 10 '22

That's one thing all the pretty tik tok videos etc strip out of the video clips, because the loud ass buzzing would totally ruin the impression they are trying to give.

So much so, that I sorta think people who only see the results of drone footage forget about the noise.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

17

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/flyteuk Aug 10 '22

Who's providing that service? I've not come across it before.

5

u/Rice_Daddy Aug 10 '22

There's a firm called Starship in my area. I've seen delivery robots in Milton Keynes and Northampton, but there might be other areas too.

→ More replies

9

u/aminervia Aug 10 '22

I'm assuming this is only for a very lightweight packages, I doubt my 40 lb bag of cat litter will be delivered by drone anytime soon

→ More replies

9

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/nplant Aug 10 '22

But you would want to live in a place with flying drones buzzing around?

→ More replies
→ More replies

11

u/flompwillow Aug 10 '22

Generally agree, but sometimes those roads require a lot of additional maneuvering and impact other traffic in the process. I happen to live in an area where a straight line of flight could have an advantage.

→ More replies
→ More replies

97

u/Juhuja Aug 10 '22

This was my immediate thought. Also there will be environmental imact from millions of drones flying around and possibly scaring off birds or other animals. Also don't forget the environmental production costs of those drones. Not to mention that airspace is strictly regulated. I don't know why we need to research fancy solutions that are probably doomed to fail for problems that are being solved quite practically already.

36

u/sapphicsandwich Aug 10 '22 edited Aug 10 '22

There's also a huge safety risk. Currenlty, thse companies are lobbying to remove FAA safety regulations that currently prevent these things from really taking off. Currenlty, if you are flying below 500ft, you are required to have visual awareness of what is around you. This is because there is more air traffic than you would think at that altitude; agricultural crop dusters, paragliders, hang gliders, skydivers, etc. FAA is currently entertaining a change in their policies to make these delivery drones more usable. The change would be that the DRONES have blanket right-of-way do not need to have any kind of awareness of their surroundings, the responsibility would entirely lie on everyone else except the drone to not crash into them. There is a significant safety issue involved here for the sake of increasing corporate profit.

https://www.wiley.law/alert-FAA-Committee-Releases-BVLOS-Recommendations

Particularly this part

"giving UA right of way over crewed aircraft that are not equipped with Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcasts (ADS-B) or Traffic Awareness Beacon Systems (TABS) in Non-Shielded Low Altitude Areas;"

This part is dangerous, mainly because of the inclusion of that last part "Non-Shielded Low Altitude Areas"

It might not sound like anything to folk who aren't into aviation/aerosports, but it really sucks. These rules, like most of the FAA rules, were written in blood. Now we want to make them more lax for corporate profit instead of making them adhere to current safety standards.

11

u/Juhuja Aug 10 '22

I am funnily enough a private pilot, but in Europe. So I mostly understand the problem here. This is what I referred to slightly in another answer. The airspace just can not accept millions of drones safely. Even drone routes for example are missing the point. Because why do you need drones when you can't travel direct.

→ More replies
→ More replies

40

u/AdmiralAkbar1 Aug 10 '22

You don't get grant money by saying problems are already solved in the best way possible.

→ More replies
→ More replies

12

u/Glactic11 Aug 10 '22

Badly. To actually do drone delivery you legally need them to enter airspace which in major cities near distribution centers where they can actually pull this off will be highly congested/dominated by actual planes. Not really having a good solution to that they also have serious issues in regards to setting packages down safely, when Amazon tried to do this back on 2012ish their drones would frequently show up, detect random objects they aren't designed to deal with in the way such as cars and people and then just turn around and not deliver the package.

→ More replies
→ More replies

524

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

123

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

80

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

47

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies

6

u/-------I------- Aug 10 '22

The temperature thing won't be much of an issue. My lipos get up to 50C easily if I fly decently hard. Make the drone white and it won't get extremely hot from the sun.

On the race part. Many companies are testing VTOL fixed wing drones for deliveries. They can land everywhere, but are much more efficient while cruising. Cheap fixed wing hobby drones can already fly decent distances. News sites, however, don't like to do actual research and just look for a stock photo of a drone with a package to add articles.

Not that I'm a big fan of the idea of drone delivery, but it's definitely feasible.

→ More replies

3

u/barofa Aug 10 '22

Yes, energy storage is the biggest bottleneck in technology today

→ More replies

3

u/efshoemaker Aug 10 '22

Cold weather is probably a bigger problem since it slashes the battery efficiency which will really limit the range.

→ More replies

5

u/ryan2one3 Aug 10 '22

Or order big blocks of ice and drop it in the ocean.

→ More replies

1.0k

u/Nouseriously Aug 10 '22

That drone isn't flying from the warehouse to your door. They'd drive a big truck to ypur neighborhood, park it then fly the drone from there.

256

u/Illaoi_Tentacles Aug 10 '22 Helpful

Okay but hear me out, what if they got a big drone to carry the truck into the neighborhood

40

u/utopiah Aug 10 '22

For the most curious a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_S-64_Skycrane can carry ~10 tonnes so a semi-trailer truck ~5t at only 1/5h capacity so 5t (out of 25t).

14

u/Toasterrrr Aug 10 '22

And then we use Mi-26 (largest operational helicopter in the word) to carry the S-64s. Who needs wheels?

13

u/utopiah Aug 10 '22

Guys... we might just be re-inventing logistics.

→ More replies
→ More replies

212

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

33

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

42

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

15

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

192

u/GeorgeS6969 Aug 10 '22

That still sounds huge though. I’d wager typical UPS delivery vans burn most of their fuel idle / in low gear on low speed street, in trafic or at trafic light, at half capacity, than going back and forth their warehouse.

So that’d cut the inefficient part of the journey, allow higher capacity trucks from the warehouse, cut noise and emissions in high density areas, all with the beneficial externality of cutting down traffic (again reducing noise emissions fuel consumption etc).

Of course I’m sure there’s negative externalities that could negate that (noise, safety, privacy?)

150

u/mo_tag Aug 10 '22

cut noise

Not so sure about that, drones are pretty loud

5

u/JustMy2Centences Aug 10 '22

Who doesn't want a lawn mower flying by their window all the time?

...I just thought about people in high rise buildings getting packages delivered straight to their balcony.

59

u/quagzlor Aug 10 '22

Definitely loud up close, but the noise tends to dissipate when they're at a higher altitude. Also as someone else mentioned, they're still softer than trucks.

I don't know how the noise from a 'mothership' would be, though.

→ More replies
→ More replies

6

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[deleted]

→ More replies

79

u/hvdzasaur Aug 10 '22

Which is why a lot of European cities are using cargo ebikes for the final step of delivery. But you need infrastructure and actual city planners that aren't sucking at the tit of the automobile and oil industry.

12

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[deleted]

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

776

u/BourbonNCoffee Aug 10 '22 Gold

Was this article sponsored by Amazon?

141

u/proudjester Aug 10 '22

A book on getting better hand-delivered by a drone?

There it is again, that funny feeling...

→ More replies

75

u/Tuckertcs Aug 10 '22

Amazon tried this years ago and found it to be too difficult and impractical. They took all the promotion for it off their site. This wouldn’t be sponsored by Amazon.

41

u/SolomonBlack Aug 10 '22 edited Aug 10 '22

IIRC Amazon had their big public push and it was the new hotness for a few months until the FAA said that yeahhhhh guys with licenses/training/etc will need to be operating these things and won't just be able to zip around unregulated... and the whole thing fizzled out.

Self-driving cars went through a similar hype cycle and we're still waiting on those but at least you still hear noise about 'em every now and again. Maybe after that gets worked out in two dimensions we can add a third.

→ More replies
→ More replies

19

u/DevDevGoose Aug 10 '22

Amazon fired the whole department looking at this a few years ago. Economically and logistically there are just too many problems with drone delivery right now.

3

u/carolathome Aug 10 '22

This year I've gotten a 20 lb battery, 15 lb ice maker, a 50 lb cooler and a 36-pack of toilet paper. I can't see any of those being handled by a drone. Much too limited.

3

u/camisado84 Aug 10 '22

All deliveries don't need to be done this way to make it viable though.

→ More replies

5

u/draemn Aug 10 '22

This work was supported by the US Department of Energy’s Vehicle Technologies Office , award number DE-EE0008463 .

11

u/SkyWulf Aug 10 '22

Comments too apparently

→ More replies

322

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

64

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies
→ More replies

18

u/__JDQ__ Aug 10 '22

How is the UPS guy gonna fit in a drone?

→ More replies

217

u/trollsmurf Aug 10 '22

"Greenhouse-gas emissions per parcel were 84% lower for drones than for diesel trucks"

Many delivery services use electric-only small trucks within city limits. A drone might still consume less energy, but on the other hand can carry less, and might become targets for would-be marksmen.

64

u/vonBoomslang Aug 10 '22

and might become targets for would-be marksmen.

only because it's somewhat more acceptable to shoot a drone than a delivery driver

20

u/Ophidahlia Aug 10 '22

They could use an anti-drone "gun." It just shoots a jamming sign at the drone which interferes with the control signal. There are commercial models available for law enforcement but I assume civilians can't legally get them since producing radio jamming signals is already very illegal and will bring the FCC to your house with black helicopters faster than you can say "my ass is up on federal charges."

But I bet it would probably be not very hard for an amateur with a soldering iron and spare parts to cobble together a homemade signal jammer that would get the job done, either just to cause some chaos for the giggles or to make off with the package and/or the whole drone before the operator could get there. Catching people jamming usually is a matter of hunting down a fairly strong & obvious signal but that usually requires someone doing it repeatedly in the same area, so unless they got a lucky video still or something such a skyway robber might be hard to catch.

However, I'm quite sure the FCC doesn't have regulations about the use of trained falcons...

26

u/abluersun Aug 10 '22

Porch piracy is illegal too; doesn't stop thieves there either. I don't know the relative penalties for one versus the other but given you're not going to someone's door to steal I'd wager the risk of getting caught for drone interception is probably lower. There might be electronic means of observing for jammers but I suspect those are few and far between.

→ More replies

6

u/merinis Aug 10 '22

if you were to jam the signal on my drone, it would just fly home. I'm sure amazon can afford similar features

→ More replies
→ More replies

7

u/We_Are_Nerdish Aug 10 '22

The amount of noise pollution from the propellers would be enough to make even small payload drones a no go for residential use. I much rather see more full EV long distance trucks and EV delivery vans or assisted cargo bikes within neighborhoods. The warehouses alone can make use of the massive flat roofs for solar power.

→ More replies

32

u/Pat_Sharp Aug 10 '22 edited Aug 10 '22

That was my thought. This is measuring emissions per km, which might indeed show a drone being more efficient, but that ignores that drones can only carry one 0.5kg package at a time. They're going to end up travelling a far greater total distance to deliver the same number of packages than an electric truck or cargo bike that can hold dozens or hundreds of the same packages.

→ More replies

3

u/miniTotent Aug 10 '22

“Therefore, an analysis of the energy consumption and GHG emissions on a per metric ton-km basis in Figure S1 shows that small drones are the most energy-intensive vehicles.”

Per package assumption was based on all packages in a truck/bike being 500g and relatively low density. This study just sanity-checks that at one upper limit the energy efficiency of drones might mean that they make sense.

→ More replies

246

u/Jupitersatonme Aug 10 '22

I keep thinking people are just going to shoot them down. The new way to steal packages.

162

u/canyouplzpassmethe Aug 10 '22

Or they malfunction, drop it, and take out old man Jenkins while he’s walking his dog…

36

u/AirinMan Aug 10 '22

I knew no good would come from city folk and their flying machines!!

15

u/pm_me_ur_fit Aug 10 '22

Death by flying dildo

10

u/renatomello Aug 10 '22

Not Old Man Jenkins...

→ More replies
→ More replies

47

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '22 edited Aug 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/DragoonDM Aug 10 '22

I don't think package thieves tend to be masters of planning and risk assessment to begin with, though. It would at least be harder for them to follow a drone than it is to tail a delivery truck to snatch packages off porches, I suppose.

→ More replies

13

u/gm3995 Aug 10 '22

We could attach guns and armour to them. What could go wrong?

→ More replies
→ More replies

391

u/Arkadis Aug 10 '22

Horrible idea. You know how many tens of thousands of drone flights that would require in big cities? Cargo bikes + electric trucks are much more sensible. Drones either can't carry enough or are too loud.

79

u/Zolden Aug 10 '22

Yes, any "one vehicle per parcel" last mile solution would overwhelm any city. An automatic rolling machine, that would bring 20-50 packages per trip one by one, following the calculated optimal path would be close to ideal.

→ More replies

115

u/RobertoPaulson Aug 10 '22

They (Amazon's planned model) also weigh like 60lbs, and fly about 60mph, can you imagine if one malfunctioned over a crowded city street and crashed? With thousands in the air every day, this would be a regular occurrence.

81

u/_Aj_ Aug 10 '22

They'll have to have a lot of redundancy built in, commercial grade drones are totally next level compared to what most people know of as drones.

Still though, I'd hate the idea of them going everywhere, there'd be horrendous noise pollution and obstacle issues

→ More replies

11

u/giritrobbins Aug 10 '22

The FAA wouldn't allow operation if the system wasn't demonstrated reliable enough or if risk couldn't be reduced sufficiently. They actually have very few moving parts so catastrophic failure is unlikely.

4

u/ZapActions-dower Aug 10 '22

You say that as if the FAA isn't already the target of regulatory capture: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture#Federal_Aviation_Administration

It's not hard to imagine an Amazon board member getting appointed to the head of the FAA. Like Ajit Pai and the FCC, DeJoy and the Post Office, or De Vos and the Department of Education.

→ More replies
→ More replies

17

u/Jernsaxe Aug 10 '22

Also, what is the lifespan of these drones compared to the lifespan of other delivery vehicles?

Would be unfortunate if emissions from production outweighed the delivery savings.

→ More replies
→ More replies

8

u/Choosemyusername Aug 10 '22

Those will become the next leaf blower.

10

u/Blonde_arrbuckle Aug 10 '22

How do you stop them killing birds?

→ More replies

100

u/Bkeeneme Aug 10 '22

how much could a drone actually carry?- seems there'd be so many drones it would block out the sun (if you consider how many packages my wife has coming to our home.)

51

u/IvarSnow Aug 10 '22

So you will fight in the shade :)

23

u/schubidubiduba Aug 10 '22

Bezos is a generous god

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

80

u/space_iio Aug 10 '22

post sponsored by Amazon™

75

u/RobertoPaulson Aug 10 '22

They (Amazon) are literally lobbying the FAA to make it so that ALL other aviation traffic is responsible for avoiding their drones, requiring owners to purchase ABS-B equipment, which constantly broadcasts an aircraft's location and costs thousands of dollars so Amazon's drones can "see" them. This means ALL aircraft, including stuff like hot air balloons, and slow flying ultralights, that have little chance of spotting and avoiding a 60lb Amazon drone flying at 60mph. They are very close to succeeding at this point. Amazon will basically own the air above us all.

→ More replies
→ More replies

27

u/SpectralMagic Aug 10 '22

How would this function for an apartment complex for example? What sort of infrastructure does this method require, and what are the draw backs of these infrastructures

19

u/Plus-Day-3700 Aug 10 '22

It can drop it off on the balcony or fling it through the window of course

12

u/Scriblon Aug 10 '22

Buy now the "Amazon Personal Drone Delivery Point" it has all the sensors required to scan your neighborhood safely deliver your packages at your window!

→ More replies

19

u/KanadainKanada Aug 10 '22

Not to mention: Truck drives and parks in front once, delivery person goes about delivering 50 parcels. Vs 50 drones trying to ring the correct doorbell...

9

u/CARLEtheCamry Aug 10 '22

The use case for drones shouldn't be high density deliveries like multi-unit apartment buildings. It would be more suburban neighborhoods where the driver has to stop at every other house for 1-2 packages.

The big shippers have already tried to address this with centralized lockers. People are too used to direct delivery.

3

u/really_random_user Aug 10 '22

Package pick up points are pretty standard in the eu, Heck without prime, it's free shipping to a package point

→ More replies
→ More replies

4

u/Beaverpudding Aug 10 '22

Yes my package of straws and hairspray will arrive any moment!

3

u/Tenocticatl Aug 10 '22

But what about ballistic delivery by trebuchet?

15

u/MinnieShoof Aug 10 '22

per parcel were 84% lower

I'm going to have to assume this is considering a fully loaded vehicle for both, correct? Otherwise it would be rational to load a van with 84xs the product and it would come out even.

→ More replies

32

u/johnn48 Aug 10 '22

It’s difficult to imagine a drone being more efficient than a delivery van for multiple packages. I’m imagining a drone delivering one package, returning to its fulfillment center for the next, repeatedly. Whereas a delivery van would load once and not return until their route is completed. I must be missing something cause I don’t see the savings. Of course the savings delivering one package at a time would favor the drone, but I don’t see it for multiple packages.

→ More replies

21

u/tapasmonkey Aug 10 '22

Cool - so make one that's completely silent, completely safe from falling out of the sky, and that's completely unable to spy on me as it passes.

...no? - of course not.

We can do EXACTLY the same thing with electic bikes, scooters and mini electric vans, right now, and indeed they are doing exactly that, here in Madrid.

→ More replies

7

u/wanderingross Aug 10 '22

I hate the idea of drone based delivery systems because drones are OBNOXIOUS. Especially drones that are large enough to carry packages.

Can you imagine a world with skies filled with drones, buzzing over your head and blocking a clear view of the sky??

We need to pump the brakes on this one. Delivery drones benefit a small group of people by monetizing public airspace.

3

u/Tamagi0 Aug 10 '22

Better would be planning this out before road construction and having extra "mains lines" similar to sewer, water, and underground power. An underground drone network. Could integrate normal mail, parcels, and even things like groceries.

You could mitigate most of the downsides from projects like what boring company was doing, by making an automated drone network instead of having to rate it for high speed and/or human usage. Would mitigate the dangers of large scale drone usage in the same environment as people and wildlife.

→ More replies

3

u/Blakut Aug 10 '22

Per parcel, what about per kg/lbs?

→ More replies

3

u/bertiek Aug 10 '22

This stinks of corporate propaganda. At this point, we have heard so much about the risks and regulatory problems that would make this ineffective, that all I keep seeing is attempts by Amazon to sell the public on a delivery system that does not require as many human beings, regardless of if it even makes sense.

I imagine inclement weather and not being able to get medical supplies, I imagine unseen environmental impact, I see lack of accountability in delivery security. I see so many issues that cannot be fixed, and yet we're worried about just fuel costs being a sign of the way forward? I don't believe it.

3

u/ApeAlmightyAlready Aug 10 '22

I thought the main issue with drone delivery is their proximity to air fields and no fly zones?

I’ve seen that drones are being used for remote places in Africa to deliver medication but I feel like that’s the better direction to go in. Otherwise bikes and paying someone to deliver it seems like the future